News about the Tehran riots struck twitter in excess while CNN.com and traditional news venues had not yet reacted to the public outcry. Major news networks now focus equally on the riots in Iran following the controversial elections, as well as the new political power represented by user-generated news and twitter.

Visit http://twitter.com/tehranbureau to observe real-time news from Tehran before it hits other news networks.

My CTO Zac made light of the extreme easiness of submitting user-generated news to the BBC. See the module at the right side of the above image: you can submit or follow news via email, video, photo, flickr, youtube, etc.

From the perspective of a startup, company, organization, or nation, user-submitted news via real-time networks is a political power. The Iranian government has proved incapable of locking down twitter posts within Iran, the same way they may censor social networking websites, blogs, or online news websites within their nation. This is akin to the web 2.0 notion of ‘Groundswell’ where top-down authority finds itself incapable of silencing thousands of distributed ‘news producers’ within a population. By analogy, governments, corporations, news agencies, and hierarchical organizations will continue to find themselves exposed to the popular news and sentiments. That is the political power of twitter.

Here are some other resources:

Tehrans Twitter Blackout Averted

From Tiananmen to Tehran (CBS)

BBC’s Coverage of Tehran

Hey midVentures. Our event last thursday was a big hit, with over 60 attendees and a panel discussion with crowdSPRING.com, ThePoint.com, InklingMarkets.com, and Cameesa.com which hopefully inspired many of us to pick up their apps and start utilizing crowd-powered work. My summary is below in the blog post….

Click here to see the event photos

Second, we have a new website. midVentures owes a debt of gratitude to Nate Kerksick, our go-to web designer who transitioned from design work on the Obama Campaign to assist our projects. Thanks to Zac Witte for the 48-hour turnaround on all css and html implementation.

Third, we have a new partner Ouethy Kadji. Read our stories here.

Summary of the June 4th Event

I initiated the talk with a brief summary of crowdsourcing. I defined crowdsourcing as assigning work to an undefined or unknown person / group of people, with an incentive or reward for the completed work. ‘What crowdsourcing is’ became a focal point a few times in the conversation.

I asked 3 core questions:

1. What type of work can I crowdsource?

2. When is collective intelligence more accurate than expert intelligence?

3. How can crowdsourcing help find get me more work?

These questions all circled around 1 core issue: what is the ’sweet spot’ for crowdsourced work with each application? Large or small projects? A large or small number of people collaborating? Does effective crowdsourcing require experts or the masses in order to uncover the best matches? Once a match is made (client and worker) do they leave the web system to sustain a relationship? Our audience asked a few questions regarding the efficacy of ‘crowd-sourced code’ vs. open source projects, the feasibility of the $10 billion chicago glass dome that will render winter obsolete, and the push-back from corporate staff who are worried their decision-making power is threatened by inklingmarkets.

This panel discussion definitely sparked more questions in my mind about the long-term potential of crowd-sourced applications within different industries. Perhaps a company could materialize from market demand and self-organize out of the crowds of professionals to produce a product or service. Unfortunately, the discussion ended before I could develop my idea.